| .. |
 |
| Siren! |
| January, 2000 |
 |
|
Sensuality is a subjective thing and as a descriptive term, I
dont use it often. I think it means different things for me than
it does for most people. Sexuality is not always about intercourse,
about having a partner, or about activities involving the genitals.
Sexuality is something that exists on many levelscerebral, physical,
emotionaland is as much about cutting open a bright orange and
eating its sweetness as it is about having intercourse.
Why are the two concepts separated? We can see an answer if we
look at sex as its represented in the mainstream culture. There,
sex is divorced from the senses. Much of this arises from the
Judeo-Christian tradition (especially in its modern and conservative
interpretations) of separating the mind, body and spirit. A whole
moral school developed out of this separation, with rules on when
you can have sex and when you cant, who you can have sex with,
and how youre supposed to be spiritual versus sexual.
This separation has been very successful, especially in the U.S,
despite the fact that many of these notions and practices are
no longer reasonable for a modern culture. Sexuality and sexual
pleasure in the U.S. is too often conditioned towards the "dirty"
and the "taboo." With this conditioning, sexual pleasure comes
when the taboos are exposed, broken or exercised. It is a strange
little cycle: we learn to feel bad breaking "rules" in order to
feel good. This becomes obvious when you look at the Internet.
The most widely trafficked sex sites are "barely teen" sites,
bestiality sites, the nonconsensual-this and nonconsensual-that
sites. For sex to work, a lot of people need to feel naughty or
wrong.
I worked in education for a long time before publishing Scarlet
Letters: A Journal of Femmerotica full time. Most of the kids
I taught were between 3 and 6 years old. I cant tell you how
many times during naptime youd see kids start masturbating. Why
not? Theyre cuddled up in blankets, its nice and warm, and theyre
feeling good and safe. Some of the teachers would catch sight
of this or that kid with his or her hand down their pants and
say very sternly, "Stop that!" No explanation, no nothing, just
this moment of shame.
The first time I heard this, I pulled aside the teacher in question
and said, "Well, congratulations. You just provided the first
time this kid was sexually ashamed." Just saying a shaming "No!"
is not how you deal with this, and it made my heart heavy to see
it. There are much better ways, like teaching that there are appropriate
and inappropriate times for everything. Some teachers would get
upset if they saw a bunch of kids in the bathroom together. Kids
would be checking each other out, as children do, and some of
the teachers would have a really hard time with it. I dont see
the problem. There is no line for kids between their "sensuality"
and their "sexuality." They just are the way they are, and how
beautiful and precious that is.
Heather Corinna is the editor and founder of the award-winning
womens erotica journal, Scarlet Letters, and the teen sex information
clearinghouse, Scarleteen. She lives in Saint Paul, MN with many
furry creatures amidst an awful lot of leopard print.
|
 |
|
|