|
"He thought that every woman should be at one time or another
a whore. He thought that all women, deep down, wished to be a
whore once in their lives and that it was good for them. It was
the best way to retain a sense of being female" (Anais Nin, Delta of Venus 230).
I've always secretly wanted to be a whore -- perhaps not so much
a prostitute, but an object of desire, an otherworldly, larger-than-life
creature of immense sexuality and, therefore, infinite power.
Every woman knows that her sex is the key to her power, and I
wanted that -- I wanted power and control, to be a figure looked
up at and lusted after. I wanted it all, while still remaining
safe behind the untouchableness of mystical appeal.
In spite of, or perhaps because of, my average middle-class upbringing
-- average face behind average glasses framed by average brown
hair -- I wanted the thrill reserved only for sex gods and goddesses,
the glamour of being judged for my sexual prowess, the allure
of being judged not by my intellect (which I felt anyone dedicated
to reading the right books could achieve), but of being judged
by something far more difficult to accomplish - endless legs,
luscious hair, tender breasts, and intoxicating beauty.
An inevitable fascination with the adult industry followed. The
pages of Playboy magazine seemed far less attainable to me, with my modest cleavage,
than the halls of a respectable liberal arts college, and so I
coveted them all the more. I stared the way one does when one
is forbidden entry, at the stripper I saw showing up for work
with a small suitcase one afternoon when I was in Times Square
with my mother, at the dark strip bar around the corner from the
local bagel shop in my small college town, at the shiny patent
leather stiletto heels for sale in the local sex shop, at the
shrink-wrapped magazines I knew I'd never buy - I stared and I
studied, wondering how I'd ever get inside, desperate to be assimilated
into this world which existed on the outskirts of mine.
By the time I was a junior in college, I braved my first strip
club. It was mid-afternoon, and it seemed like the only non-boring
place to get a drink in downtown DC - the timing and location
were right for my first real exposure. Once inside, I was astonished.
The girls weren't superhuman, their breasts weren't even that
big, but the lights, the stage, the music, the air - something
about the place catapulted them to another planet. I'd always
thought it was something about the girls that made them special.
Now I realized it was something far less tangible.
I knew those outfits could be purchased easily, I'd seen them
hanging cheaply on the racks at many of the stores I peered around
illicitly, yet on their bodies they seemed to take on a life of
their own. I started to wonder - would my legs look that long
in those heels? Would my breasts look as enticing in that bra?
Would my figure look as supple and curvaceous framed by the right
bit of lace? If I got on that stage, would the right soundtrack
turn me into a star under those blinking colored lights? Could
I ever be one of those girls?
About a year later, my turn finally came. The bar was in my college
town, but so seedy I knew none of my classmates would ever enter.
The lighting came from below the stage, multi-colored squares
straight out of Saturday Night Fever, and the chosen soundtrack
for my first dance was Alannah Myles' "Black Velvet." I named
myself Karla, and I was on my way to getting hooked on stardom.
I stripped for a couple weeks, just long enough to learn I was
good at it, good at shaking my hips, at peeling off my bra, at
getting the men to think I loved them, and at loving me enough
to keep plying the cash in an attempt to keep my big blue eyes
from drifting elsewhere. I learned what it was like to be an object
of desire, to be up on that stage, unattainable and lusted after,
and I loved it.
I did it just long enough to learn all that, and just long enough
to be disgusted by the sticky stage and the pathetic men with
the missing teeth, by the leering drunken gazes and the customers
who didn't understand why I wouldn't go home with them, by the
conversations that were prefaced and concluded by glimpses of
my pussy, and by the fact that my worth was measured in dollar
bills.
I knew I was worth a lot more, so I took my skills, honed during
my several weeks on the job and some newly discovered natural
talent, and set off to New York. Once there, I tried to figure
out how I could get my fix while avoiding the sticky stage and
the missing teeth. I knew New York had clubs that were miles up
the social ladder from the dive bar in which I had taken my first
steps, but those strip joints were filled with several girls dancing
at any one time, on shared or separate stages. I didn't want that.
I didn't want to be just another dancer -- I needed to be the
only girl at the bar.
I found my next stage accidentally. It was in Manhattan's East
Village. It wasn't a strip bar, although I wore a short skirt,
ripped tight shirt, push-up bra and high heels. I wasn't a dancer,
although I was dancing on stage, underneath blinking lights, looking
longingly at my patrons while seducing them with my body and eyes.
I was still shaking my hips in that slow, tantalizing way, still
pulling my skirt up just enough to tease, still running my fingers
over my body -- only this time my soundtrack wasn't Alannah Myles,
it was me. I was singing, and it was my first show with my band.
The connection between stripping and singing isn't commonly made.
Or, at least, people don't explicitly compare Britney to Candi,
since, after all, one sings in expensive concerts and for MTV,
and the other subsists on tips in exchange for wearing barely-there
g-strings (if anything at all), elaborately hair-sprayed do's,
flashing her privates without even a mark of modesty, and shaking
her body in a way which should only happen after dark, in a bedroom,
and even then, perhaps best not at all.
But read that over - are the two really so different? Singers
are often seen as hypersexualized vixens, with skimpy, see-through
outfits (sometimes held up by tape, àla Jennifer Lopez), frequently
sporting stylishly disheveled hair, and performing thrusting dance
moves in front of millions that would make the average woman blush.
So what's the difference? One difference, of course, is the payment
system, but other than tips vs. royalties, are the two really
so far removed?
In both the adult and music industries, the woman is seen as an
entertainer, judged, at least partly, by her sex appeal. The stripper
and the singer are seen as exposers, revealing their bodies, their
souls, or both; threatening when they appear too much in control,
when the power outweighs the vulnerability quotient. When it becomes
apparent how thoughtfully the stripper/singer has constructed
her image, it becomes alarmingly obvious that she has dictated
her own objectification in a way that a Penthouse model cannot - cue the backlash.
The Penthouse model, like the stripper and the singer, is a commodity, a marketable
object of sexuality - highly erotic and highly desired. However,
the singer/stripper brings this commodification to another, more
dangerous level, because she can control it. There is no question
that a singer, like a stripper, becomes an object for sale, market
worth to be determined quite often by luster of hair, color of
eyes, and size of waist. Madonna, on Larry King Live (10/9/02) agreed that, as a singer, "You are selling your own
image when you sell records."
The stripper/singer sells her image, or the fantasy she is selling,
when she performs. She succeeds by creating a feminine ideal,
through the ultimate commodification of body and identity, and,
in turn, sexuality. It is her job to become what the audience
wants and to make them want what she becomes. She sells records
and gathers tips (royalties) by becoming a fantasy, a pin-up,
their babe.
Here enters the importance of fantasy, the elements of theater
and mystique. The singer/stripper needs to build an alter-ego,
a new identity, in order to become this ultimate babe, this Larger
than Life creature of sex and beauty. People are paying to be
entertained and seduced, seeking relief from reality and the mundane.
The stage, the lights, the smoke and music all combine to elevate
the stripper/singer's mystique - creating something that cannot
be reproduced elsewhere, and certainly not in the daylight. No
one wants the girl next door. Everyone wants what they can't have.
Physically, the strip bar and the nightclub, like most things
associated with after-hours entertainment, share many similarities
- often ending up in the same neighborhoods, featuring minimal
windows, dark, unrevealing facades, affiliations with drugs and
alcohol, a sense of the forbidden (literally for those under 21),
and a definite draw for the non-family oriented crowd.
The appeal of the naughty stripper and the sexy singer thrives
on the insinuation of the exotic, the lawless, the freaky, transporting
the viewer not only into fantasy but also into the shadow world
beyond the pale.(1) The thrill of stepping across both a strip
bar threshold and that of a divey nightclub stems from the "Shudder
of the Bad."(2) This rebellious excitement - so bad, it's good
- adds to the singer/stripper's mystique, helping to create a
persona which could never be found anywhere else.
Both rock shows and strip clubs demand a suspension of the real,
a fantasy-based distance from the everyday, in order to succeed
- rock stars don't get sick, they don't go to the bathroom or
shave their legs, and strippers don't have boyfriends, or children,
or the ability to judge their clients. Intimacy is the ultimate
image destroyer, to be avoided at all costs. The stripper/singer
is desexualized at the very moment when she is stripped naked
- at the moment when she reveals too much, she loses her mystique.
When the clothes are off, the show is over. Madonna's role as
a sex icon began to slip just after the publication of her book,
Sex. No one wanted to see her fully naked - it was much more fun
to imagine. Once we'd seen it, her show was over. The money is
all in the tease.
The final blow to Madonna's status as a sex icon came when she
became a mother. The ultimate sex icon, both stripper and singer,
must remain forever available to all, possessed by none.(3) Just
like a stripper can never be married or gay, allowing us to cling
to the hope that she may one day be ours, the sexiest singer is
one that we secretly yearn to make ours. By immersing herself
fully in the role of a "family woman," as mother and wife, she
was no longer available for our fantasies. Nothing kills the virgin
image (however loosely implied) than being surrounded by babies.
We need to believe that no one else has had her.
Our fascination with Britney and Justin's sex life had much to
do with the fact that we needed her to stay a virgin - as long
as she was unclaimed sexually, she was unclaimed physically. During
a recent appearance at a New York radio station, the host promised
to play Justin Timberlake's new single 30 times a day in exchange
for information on his and Britney's sex life.(4)
Our pursuit of personal information is driven by the need to feel
that she could be ours, that we understand her, that it is only
to us that the singer/stripper reveals who she really is. She
is elusive, but if she lets us in, she might become ours. It is
this tension between the real and the theater, the truth and the
mystique, that compels us to watch our favorite stars on stage,
searching for a hint of the truth while enjoying the spectacle
of the surreal. The best strippers and the most successful singers
manage to walk this fine line, carefully balancing their exposure
with their charade, teasing the audience with revelations of self
while playing up the superstar glamour which brought them there
in the first place.
The audience enters the club seeking to be entertained while the
same curiosity which fuels sales of People searches for glimpses
of the real, for the split second of guard-dropping and an improvised
smile. We enjoy the glamorous photos of the couture dresses, but
we thrill at the rare shot of Pamela Anderson in sweats, sans
makeup. We have not come only to watch a perfectly rehearsed act,
with scripted dialogue and choreographed moves -- we are entertained
by the practiced lines and the professional dances, but we are
more compelled and seduced by the possibility of peeking behind
the mask, of being let in to the secret world of their fantasies.
After all, the entire premise of both the stripper's and the singer's
performance is disclosure, not masquerade.(5) The stripper strips,
the singer sings - and both acts involve a peeling off, a form
of revelation and communication. They are selling a particular
version of their selves, a carefully composed mixture of truth
and fiction. If it is too fake, it becomes theater and the audience
remains detached, if it gets too real, it becomes uncomfortable
- no one wants to hear about a stripper's blister or see Britney's
ingrown hairs. These people are stars and must further the illusion
of living lives that are somehow above ours, that's what brings
us to fawn at their feet. If they were just like us, there would
be no need. Both the adult and entertainment industries exist
by teasing us with just the right doses of glamour and grit.
It is this careful balance, of exposure and disguise that keeps
us seduced. The primary allure of the stripper over the Penthouse
centerfold is that she's there, she's real, she's accessible,
and, through dialogue, we may find out who she is really is, and,
through that revelation, she might be available to us. We expect
and appreciate much the same from our singers, reveling in their
couture fashion, stunning good looks, and superhuman bodies, while
seeking scraps of gossip and truth to make us feel closer to them.
Listeners expect their pop stars' music to be essentially personal,
if not outright autobiographical. Even those whose music is strictly
interpretive -- Tina Turner, Linda Ronstadt, Whitney Houston --
are lauded for making other people's songs 'theirs.'(6)
We constantly analyze our stars' every move, scrutinizing the
treasured photos of them relaxing at home, listening to their
songs and feeling their pain. We identify with them, we need to
connect with them, because as this brings them down to our level,
it creates the possibility that we may rise to theirs.
But the defining quality of diva pop has been the tendency for
the singers (and the music press) to treat every new record as
if it were a chapter in the psychobiography of the artist...New
releases are routinely accompanied by fawning profiles about how
the singer overcame great obstacles to deliver a brave personal
statement.(7)
Another aspect of this approach is that, by keeping the singer
linked to her personal drama, deflecting potential conversation
about her music by discussing her fashion and her boyfriends,
we are able to marginalize her role as creative businesswoman
or artist. Beneath much of the rhetoric of adult entertainment
lies a fear of women realizing their sexuality while holding power
over it, and therefore over men.(8) The same applies to the music
industry -- judging female singers on their looks is a way to
make them safer and less threatening.
Even though singing and dancing are both traditionally feminine
activities, through eroticism they become more powerful and complex.
Just as a stripper is a more loaded figure than a chaste classical
dancer, Madonna has always been more dangerous than an acoustic
folk singer. Sexuality makes these women threatening, more dominant,
and more subversive.
Public female nudity, flaunted and enjoyed, cannot help but suggest
to more rigorous conformers the seed of something perilous to
social order. Its immediate implications are the unfettering of
male lust, the contamination of commerce with sex (and vice versa)...The
stripper personifies the exotic and dangerous outsider...the woman
whose sexual aura creates havoc everywhere she goes.(9)
After all, sex, and the concept of flesh without intimacy, threatens
the precarious structure of social order, challenging that which
is ordered and controlled with the demands of the primal and irrational.
The very concept of exchanging sex for money, or of using sex
to sell a separate product (like record albums), disrupts patriarchal
hegemony as money replaces the structure of personal relationships
and places woman as beneficiary, in control of her own image and,
therefore, her own wallet.
By removing her clothes, the stripper/singer disrupts the social
structure set up by Adam and Eve,(10) who suppressed the evil
realm of sex and desire by clothing themselves. As she defies
token female passivity, strutting her sexuality and controlling
her own image (even going so far as to use both for financial
gain), the singer/stripper takes on masculine attributes. Not
only is she is in charge, but dictating the terms of her own objectification
and profiting from it, but she is using men to her advantage,
seducing them with bedroom eyes, a husky voice, and revealing
clothing.
Most alarmingly, the relationships she creates are built not only
on sex, but on lies -- she isn't really in love with her customers,
she is just pretending to be. Hence, the backlash by the moral
right at strippers and the backlash at our pop icons when they
get a bit too trashy. At the same time, the more seductive the
strip, the more delicious the dance, the more the rest of us line
up to pay.
We want our dancers and our singers to delight us, to entrance
us. Just as they seek to be lusted after, we lust after them because
we need the fantasy to distract us from our lives. Their bodies
are their tools, their products, and we choose the best ones to
support. My first night on stage, I learned that my singing abilities,
while important, paled in comparison to making the right kind
of eye contact. I could be the best singer out there, but if I
hid behind glasses and mousy brown hair, no one would pay attention.
When I put on my makeup and my short skirt and recycled the moves
I'd learned at that dive bar in Connecticut, suddenly it all came
together.
There may not be much of a difference between flaunting my short
skirts at a nightclub or peeling back a G-string in a strip bar
from my father's perspective, but for me -- for me I've found
the perfect art form. I've found the easiest, most satisfying
way to get my junkie fix. Stripping holds little allure for me
these days, provided I get at least one gig a month. If I'm guaranteed
one night of feeling those eyes upon me, watching their faces
draw closer as I reach my hand under my shirt or stretch my skirt
up my thigh, then I'm set. I'm powerful. I'm satiated. I'm desired.
If too much time goes by, if we're writing songs or someone is
out of town, and the memory of the stage starts to recede, then
I hunger for more - but I don't hunger for the missing teeth or
the sticky platforms. I don't miss the feeling of the dirty bills
against my skin. I've scratched that itch, I've lived through
it, and since it no longer seems out of reach, I don't crave it.
I've discovered my sexuality, and now, when too long passes without
a performance, I crave something else - I crave a lover, at home,
to watch me put on a solo show.
Helen Gurley Brown shot to stardom with the radical notion that
sex is good, that sexy is great, and that making the most of your
sex life means making the most of you. So many commentators from
both sides of the fence (Republicans to feminists) lecture against
the virtues of sexuality -- shouting on about how it objectifies
and degrades -- but Ms. Brown, Ms. Nin, and my own experiences
have taught me the virtues of the short skirt and the thrill of
being seen as a woman - which in turn means the thrill of being
seen as a sexual being, in control of my sexuality, in control
of myself, and in control of those around me.
I don't need to see a room full of drunken leers to remind me
that I'm desirable and therefore powerful. I have already discovered
that I am. Now all I need is one pair of eyes to look at me with
love and desire. If I can get that, and a career under the lights
- I'll never want anything again.
*********
Footnotes
(1) David A. Scott, Behind the G-String (North Carolina: McFarland & Co., Inc. 1996) 119.
(2) Umberto Eco, "Travels in Hyperreality," in Travels in Hyperreality (Orlando: Harvest/HBJ 1986) 57.
(3) M.G. Levine, "From Vanna to Amana." Literature and Psychology 35.4 (1989).
(4) Amy Reiter, "Nothing Personal" in Salon, September 27, 2002.
(5) Scott 62.
(6) J.D. Considine, "A Pop Idol's Survival," in NY Times, February 17, 2002.
(7) Charles Taylor, "Arc of Diva," in Salon, March 7, 2002.
(8) Stacy Reed, "All Stripped Off," in Whores and Other Feminists, ed. Jill Nagle (New York: Routledge 1997) 183, 184.
(9) Scott 134.
(10) Murray Davis, Smut: Erotic Reality/Obscene Ideology (Chicago: University of Chicago Press 1983) 72.
|